| Search found 12 matches |
|
| Author |
Message |
 Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 3
Views: 4702
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: 28-Aug-2005 09:31 Subject: RE: User Review: Henderson Armaments Inc. |
forgot that it isnt in my sig line here.
The adres for Henerson Armaments is
http://www.geocities.com/cjm_rcng/index.html
|
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 3
Views: 4702
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 27-Aug-2005 16:48 Subject: User Review: Henderson Armaments Inc. |
| Quote:
On 2004-07-20, Oafman wrote:
Some good information. Most of which is elsewhere. The text is hard to read due to bad planning of the background on all the pages. Some of the custom mechs are ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 5
Views: 4476
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 09-Jun-2004 00:51 Subject: RE: FOMOCO |
| What you dont know is that GM is looking into starting a Division called Chevrolet to build Warships, Mostly Corvettes *g* and the long defnunct (like a thousand years or so) Chrysler Corp, after bein ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 5
Views: 4860
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 06-Jun-2004 15:19 Subject: RE: Multi Purpose Mechs |
| well I understand that, but every company is gonna wan to make "higher levels" of whatever they make, otherwise we woudl all drive around in cars that all cost very little, a High line, standard line, ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 5
Views: 4860
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 05-Jun-2004 01:55 Subject: RE: Multi Purpose Mechs |
| I noticed that all of the Omni bases were using Standard engines. Wouldnt it be a good idea to produce Light engined and XL engined versions that have higher rates of speed with comparable Armor/Pod s ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 3
Views: 3669
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 31-May-2004 13:34 Subject: User Review: Champion CHP-KS2A |
| Quote:
On 2004-05-23, ralgith wrote:
3 words: This Is Nice . I would use concentrated fire to blow this to hell if I ever faced it. The firepower is good, and combined with a TC, deadly.
Quote:
On 2 ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 25
Views: 11398
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 04-May-2004 16:21 Subject: RE: Rank? |
good thing it doesnt go by time in service, we would all probly be a few years before we could reach each faction's version of sargent
|
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 10
Views: 4945
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 29-Mar-2004 15:41 Subject: RE: Champion vs. Wyvern |
| I would have to take the Champion myself. As for either of these being Star League Mechs, you would need the CHP-1N Champion and the WVE-5N Wyvern to square off from TRO 2750. I still think though, in ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 63
Views: 22538
|
Forum: General Off Topic Posted: 28-Mar-2004 13:30 Subject: RE: Best Monthy Python lines |
| "And St Attila raised the hand grenade up on high saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade that it mayest blow Thine enemies to teeny tiny bits, in Thy mercy' and the Lord did grin and the people ... |
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 16
Views: 9234
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 28-Mar-2004 13:19 Subject: RE: Favorite Assault Mech Weight To Play |
85 tons baby! Stalker, Battlemaster, Masakari. They are all in the 85 ton family.
|
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 21
Views: 10816
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 28-Mar-2004 01:02 Subject: RE: Funny thing happened.... |
I thought yo had to have HMPread, if you dont this will save me alot of space and time in the longrun, not having to make a coipy of the mech in HMP and then for MM making a seperate in in TDB.
|
| Topic: |
CJ_Keys
Replies: 11
Views: 5314
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 28-Mar-2004 00:56 Subject: RE: Design intro dates. |
| well, TRO 2750 has no actual date for the Hussar HSR-200-D and only references to the actions of the 51st Hussar Regiment, XXX Corps in 2630.
TRO 3050 revised states "Originally designed in 2630 by t ... |
