| Search found 234 matches |
|
| Author |
Message |
 Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 3
Views: 4645
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: 24-Dec-2004 22:29 Subject: RE: Is CBT down again? |
| And its back up due to some great work by Speck. Enjoy!
Paul |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 3
Views: 4645
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 24-Dec-2004 15:03 Subject: RE: Is CBT down again? |
| Yeah, I work until 4AM to get the next Battlechat up, and then the apache server decides to die.
FTP, admin, all that stuff works, it's just not serving webpages anymore.
Speck and Oddy are working ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 39
Views: 20541
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Dec-2004 12:25 Subject: RE: 3025: which 80-tonner do you prefer? |
| Awesome. I love how it looks, and I love the amount of damage it inflicts. It's a huge problem on any battlefield, even well in to 3067.
The others don't impress me as much, and IMHO it looks bette ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 20
Views: 12705
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Dec-2004 12:23 Subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
| Griffin. I've done unholy amounts of damage with these. It constantly surprises me with how long it lasts, and how much pain it can inflict.
Also like the Wolverine, but I really prefer the Marik v ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 12
Views: 8933
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Dec-2004 12:21 Subject: RE: 3025: which 60-tonner do you prefer? |
| Another tough batch to pick from.
Like the 40 ton bracket, the 60 ton bracket seems to have a lot of Mechs that are considered inferior by many. I went with an Ostsol as it's fast, has a lot of fire ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 12
Views: 10846
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Dec-2004 12:17 Subject: RE: 3025: which 40-tonner do you prefer? |
| Tough one.
I pretty much concur with jymset's analysis of these Mechs. Of the bunch, the Withworth is the most powerful, firepower wise, and it's armor aint bad for a 40 tonner. It's speed is way t ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 14
Views: 12250
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 15-Dec-2004 23:32 Subject: RE: TRO:3055 revised |
| Quote:
On 2004-12-15 02:19, jymset wrote:
Well, it's a bit of a case of all of us being out of luck, right? It wasn't like I was trying to promote my own spin on things....
But thank you very much fo ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 15
Views: 11765
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 15-Dec-2004 23:29 Subject: RE: Is Mechwarrior canon? |
| Quote:
On 2004-12-14 21:29, Karagin wrote:
Well while that might be true for some, a lot of folks take it that if someone contected with BT publishes something in say Battletechnology or Star Date or ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 2
Views: 3814
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 14-Dec-2004 19:08 Subject: RE: Inconsistency question |
| Quote:
On 2004-12-09 22:29, StarRaven wrote:
Anybody know what's up?
Wishful thinking.
Paul |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 15
Views: 11765
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 14-Dec-2004 19:06 Subject: RE: Is Mechwarrior canon? |
|
On 2004-12-09 21:25, chihawk wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-12-09 20:58, Karagin wrote:
Quote:
So nothing done up by canon authors in say Battletechnology or Star Date would be canon even if it made to a TRO ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 14
Views: 12250
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 14-Dec-2004 19:00 Subject: RE: TRO:3055 revised |
| Quote:
On 2004-12-11 22:09, jymset wrote:
The miniatures will remain valid? Excellent!
(Though mind you, in between my post and your answer, I did order 2 Baboons and 1 Kraken over the net.... )
... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 15
Views: 11765
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 09-Dec-2004 12:07 Subject: RE: Is Mechwarrior canon? |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-30 11:33, StarRaven wrote:
I think it's more like Mechwarrior 2 Mercs is based on canon.
Yeah, and MW2, the background texts of each mission are based on the Wolf and the Falcon sc ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 15
Views: 11765
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 29-Nov-2004 19:24 Subject: RE: Is Mechwarrior canon? |
| If its not in print, it's unlikely to be canon.
FCCW includes links to the MW4 game, but don't read too much in to the various mentions.
Paul |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 25
Views: 20309
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Nov-2004 13:00 Subject: RE: streak LRM |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-17 06:23, Nightmare wrote:
I still think it would be possible and even common with "Streak" lasers. Just make sure the laser's rangefinder shows about the same range to the target as ... |
| Topic: |
Paul
Replies: 18
Views: 11853
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Nov-2004 12:03 Subject: RE: LAMs |
| No. Not even looking at the game rules, I don't like a BT universe with transformers in them. That's entirely subjective.
If they do bring them back, the rules need to be fixed. For one, I feel th ... |
