| Search found 121 matches |
|
| Author |
Message |
 Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 9
Views: 8034
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: 24-Nov-2004 16:09 Subject: RE: Fighters, Fuel, and You! |
| I need to come back to this one later (it's my birthday, time to fly), but now that I look over this again, something doesn't seem right. I think it has to do with confusing thrust points with velocit ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 9
Views: 8034
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 24-Nov-2004 15:53 Subject: RE: Fighters, Fuel, and You! |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-24 14:48, Vagabond wrote:
Even with this optional rule, you are only doubling the range. So you can fly 200 milies on a 1t tank of fuel. IMHO that is still pethetic.
Let's look at t ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 9
Views: 8034
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 24-Nov-2004 11:29 Subject: RE: Fighters, Fuel, and You! |
| Flip over to the Optional Rules section of the book. There you will find the rules for fuel consumption. Yes, tracking fuel use is an Optional Rule in AT2. If you don't want to track it, you are not o ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 8
Views: 7227
|
Forum: General Off Topic Posted: 18-Nov-2004 22:16 Subject: RE: Bio-Diesel |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-18 16:32, Nightmare wrote:
And they've got something as odd as a diesel V6...
What's so odd about that? Audi's had a few diesel V6 options, and they're offering a V8 now. There's ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 8
Views: 7227
|
Forum: General Off Topic Posted: 18-Nov-2004 10:50 Subject: RE: Bio-Diesel |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-18 07:07, Sir Henry wrote:
It would work in my 1982 Diesel Chevette....
I'm going to hurt you for bringing that monstrosity up. That engine single-handedly set diesel back in the US ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 2
Views: 2718
|
Forum: General Off Topic Posted: 06-Nov-2004 19:13 Subject: RE: Movie File Sharing Lawsuits |
| Quote:
On 2004-11-05 21:19, mud wrote:
Well, it was probably inevitable. Major movie studios have just announced that they plan on pursuing individual legal action against people who download movies ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 21
Views: 17355
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 27-Sep-2004 22:49 Subject: RE: User Review: Classic BattleTech Record Sheets: MechWarrior Dark Age I |
| I really love lines like these:
Quote:
On 2004-09-26 14:14, Karagin wrote:
Nice...and I thought all were entitled to their own opinions of both games and how DA bleeds back into CBT
We are entitled ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 4
Views: 5474
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 26-Aug-2004 09:46 Subject: RE: MW3 Lifepath Question |
| Quote:
On 2004-08-26 07:40, Kraken wrote:
Thanks.
BTW, what happened with my account? I sent in the reactivation data last month.
Pop an e-mail off to Jason. Let him know. |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 4
Views: 5474
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 25-Aug-2004 22:18 Subject: RE: MW3 Lifepath Question |
| Quote:
On 2004-08-25 14:20, Kraken wrote:
I'm trying to create a Comstar and a WoB NPC for my party to have to go against. Thing is, the MW3 main manual has nothing life-path wise that would allow it ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 10
Views: 7142
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 17-Aug-2004 13:20 Subject: RE: solaris 7 mapset question |
| Quote:
On 2004-08-16 18:26, -Mud wrote:
Same maps from the original box set?
Plus the ones from Unbound, if memory serves. |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 71
Views: 28951
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 10-Jul-2004 19:12 Subject: RE: Quoteable Quotes. What's yours? |
| "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kinda neat." |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 7
Views: 4739
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 23-Jun-2004 12:14 Subject: RE: Forward Artillery Observers (FAO) for mechs |
| There are rules for spotting for LRM Indirect Fire and artillery, both of which are "passive" actions (does not reveal the location of the unit if hidden). There are also rules for using TAG and Semi- ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 47
Views: 21818
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 23-Jun-2004 10:47 Subject: RE: Does Battletech need an overhaul? |
| Quote:
On 2004-06-23 03:46, Karagin wrote:
I have been told that MWDA was suppose to be FASA's attempt to "update the rules to allow for better streamline play" now if that is true then your idea has ... |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 9
Views: 7039
|
Forum: General Off Topic Posted: 22-Jun-2004 00:36 Subject: RE: One in a million photo |
| Shocking. |
| Topic: |
Peter_Smith
Replies: 5
Views: 5250
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 19-Jan-2004 08:50 Subject: RE: New Upgrade tech? Help |
| You get the new BattleArmors in the Revised Master Rules, the 'Mechs in TRO 3067. |
