|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 432
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 05-Jul-2024 00:07 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
  |
|
| TRO: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 | BattleMech Technical Readout
Name/Model: Hercules HRC-LS-9009
Designer: mekkatgirls
Source(s): Custom Mordel.Net Units
Technology: Inner Sphere
Technology Rating: E
Tonnage: 70
Role: Brawler
Configuration: Biped BattleMech
Era/Year: Jihad / 3080
Rules (Current): Standard
Rules (Era): Advanced
Rules (Year): Advanced
Total Cost: 16,574,887 C-Bills
Battle Value: 1,657
Chassis: Northrup-502
Power Plant: Magna 350 XL
Walking Speed: 54 kph
Maximum Speed: 86.4 kph
Jump Jets: None
Jump Capacity: None
Armor: Aldis Heavy Ferro-Fibrous Ferro-Fibrous with CASE II
Armament:
1 Fusigon Model XI ER PPC
1 Imperator Code Red LB 10-X AC
2 Aberdovey Medium Pulse Lasers
2 Martell Small Pulse Lasers
Manufacturer: Kali Yama Weapons Industries
Primary Factory: Unknown
Communications: Irian Orator-5K
Targeting & Tracking: Irian 511
================================================================================================
Overview:
The newer variant of the Hercules battlemech.
================================================================================================
Equipment Mass
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Structure: Standard 7.00
Engine: 350 XL 15.00
Walking MP: 5
Running MP: 8
Jumping MP: 0
Heat Sinks (Double): 11 [22] 1.00
Gyro: Standard 4.00
Cockpit: Standard 3.00
Armor Factor: 215 12.00
Type: Ferro-Fibrous
Internal Armor
Structure Value
Head: 3 9
Center Torso: 22 34
Center Torso (rear): 10
R/L Torso: 15 24
R/L Torso (rear): 6
R/L Arm: 11 22
R/L Leg: 15 29
================================================================================================
Weapons and Ammo Location Critical Tonnage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medium Pulse Laser RT 1 2.00
Small Pulse Laser RT (R) 1 1.00
TAG RT 1 1.00
ER PPC LT 3 7.00
Small Pulse Laser LT (R) 1 1.00
Medium Pulse Laser RA 1 2.00
CASE II LA 1 1.00
LB 10-X AC LA 6 11.00
LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10) LA 1 1.00
LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10) [Cluster] LA 1 1.00
================================================================================================
Alpha Strike Statistics
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Value (PV): 38
TP: BM, SZ: 3, TMM: 2, MV: 10"
Damage: (S) 3 / (M) 3 / (L) 2, OV: 0
Armor (A): 7, Structure (S): 3
Specials: CASEII, FLK1/1/1, REAR1/-/-, TAG
|
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2110
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 03:49 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
I e always rather liked the Hercules (but don’t care for the mini I have).
I also like this version.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 432
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 16:18 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| Do you think the IS anti-missile system is bad?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2110
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 17:56 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| Maybe not as effective as the clan one, but I wouldn’t really call it bad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 432
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 06-Jul-2024 17:01 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| do you think the laser anti-missile system is better or just runs to hot?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2110
|
| Posted: 06-Jul-2024 17:46 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
If mounted on a vehicle, the regular system is probably better, since you don’t have to worry about any possible extra heat sinks and/or power amplifiers.
Then again, if it’s your only energy weapon or any additional ones just consume what heat sinks come in a fusion core, who cares about that?
On a ‘Mech or aerospace fighter or DropShip/WarShip, heat sinks are likely less of a concern. In this case, the LAMS is probably the better choice.
But, YMMV.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-05:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
