| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Feral77
ComStar
Corporal
Joined: 02-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 72
|
 Posted: 26-Apr-2002 19:58 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
  |
|
I would love to start a conversation on the technical and Tactical uses of Quad Battlemechs.
_________________
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign you have nothing better to think about."
-Natasha Kerensky
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
Cadet
ComStar
Lieutenant, SG
Joined: 17-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 495
|
| Posted: 27-Apr-2002 01:20 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
I really dislike quads. Sure they have that diagonal movement thing, and are more stable, but they just lack room. Beyond that I have yet to see a FASA/FanPro designed Quad worth a darn. They just lack that certain...je nes sais qua.
Plus you they lose two legs, that's it for them. They can't move, they can't prop themselves up to fight.
_________________
I'm not family friendly. That's why I don't post here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ICER
Clan Hell's Horses
Galaxy Commander
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1663
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 27-Apr-2002 02:53 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quads do not have to prop. They can fire from the fallen position without proping.
And that extra stablity helps in a city fight. Running on ferreocrete and all.
As you can guess. I like the quads
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8081
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 27-Apr-2002 11:43 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Cadet, check out the Barghest...damn fine mech.
And it only needs 2 legs to move and fight 
_________________
New England Patriots--SuperBowl XXXVI Champions.
What I'm currently reading:
Special Circumstances by Sheldon Siegel
The Iron Lance by Stephen R. Lawhead
[ This Message was edited by: chihawk on 2002-04-27 11:46 ]
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Gangrene
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 939
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 27-Apr-2002 11:43 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quads greatest advantages are that they can carry a greater armor load and have greater stbility. Most FASA quads are pretty crappy, so saying they show the potential for the quad philosophy is faulty. The scorpion and goliath flat out suck, and only the Barghest comes to mind as a quad worth using.
Still, I find that quads are overall inferior to standard biped designs. The inability of quads to twist torsos is killer, which results in pilots having to be much more careful where they move their beast or they might find that they have nothing in their frontal firing arc when it comes time to fire. The lack of torso twist also forces quads to be much more susceptible to the whims of the initiative roll.
Second, their limited internal space makes it difficult to design a quad with good weapon efficiency. If you as a designer want to mount a large amount of equipment you are usually forced to settle for the heatsinks that can fit into the engine, as there is little room available in the torsos.
Overall I have to say that quads are OK, but not as good as bipeds.
_________________
Gangrene
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Feral77
ComStar
Corporal
Joined: 02-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 72
|
| Posted: 27-Apr-2002 16:50 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
I attack the problem of protecting the rear arc by arming it with a substantial weapon(PPC,Streak SRM,AC,Or Med or Lrg Laser).The use of a lrg laser or ppc on the rear flank has been a rude awakenning to many opponents over the yrs.You are right though the Fasa approved designs sucked.But I have made the better Mouse Trap
Feral
_________________
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign you have nothing better to think about."
-Natasha Kerensky
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Apr-2002 09:35 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
I love Quads.
Sir Henry
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
AWAD
Draconis Combine
Chu-sa
Joined: 06-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 766
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 21:46 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
The cool thing.... hidden, prone behind a level 1 hill. Easy roll to stand up and let it rip. Also put heat sinks in each leg and wade into the water. Your hot beast can blast away. Quads are cool and fun but not the best design....... and anyone who makes a quad Jump should be shot.
AWAD- Tarantula my ass..... how about the Death Cricket
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Karagin
Imperial Karagin Army
Imperial General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4120
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 21:48 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quads make great walking tanks...and walking missile platforms...level 3 turret rules can really be used well on these things.
I really haven't had any bad experiences with them so I am really netural on this one.
_________________
Karagin
Only the dead have seen the end of war. - Plato
"Wasted trip Man. Nobody said nuthin' about lockin' horns with no tigers." Oddball
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8081
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 21:58 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quads are full sized and can't hide behind level 1 hills....they get partial cover just like bipeds
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8081
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 21:59 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
(moved from Design Submissions to General Discussion)
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Karagin
Imperial Karagin Army
Imperial General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4120
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 22:01 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2002-05-01 21:58, chihawk wrote:
Quads are full sized and can't hide behind level 1 hills....they get partial cover just like bipeds
|
|
You mean they can't crouch down any more??
_________________
Karagin
Only the dead have seen the end of war. - Plato
"Wasted trip Man. Nobody said nuthin' about lockin' horns with no tigers." Oddball
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8081
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-May-2002 22:07 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Yes, they can go "hull down" if you're using that optional rule. If not then they are just as bipeds for LOS.
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Raven!
Clan Snow Raven
Galaxy Commander
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1326
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 02-May-2002 11:02 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
I disagree on the the height of quads, but I don't have my books, so I won't be able to look it up till I get home, but i could have SWORN i read somewhere they were considered level 1 for purposes of LOS.
Raven, needing to get to his books!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
AWAD
Draconis Combine
Chu-sa
Joined: 06-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 766
|
| Posted: 02-May-2002 12:55 Post subject: Give an opinion on Quads |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2002-05-01 21:58, chihawk wrote:
Quads are full sized and can't hide behind level 1 hills....they get partial cover just like bipeds
|
|
BZZZZZZ if a biped mech goes prone behind a lvl 1 hill he is hidden. Same goes for quads.... prone for them is crouching not laying down. Same principle, one looks cooler. And you are correct, if I stand behind a lvl hill I get partial cover just like a biped, only my torso gets blasted more.
AWAD- a favorite tactic, prone on top of a building
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
